Tuesday, January 4, 2022

The Physicality of El




The Physicality of El


The goal or purpose of this paper is to show the differences between the modern way thinking of "who" God is and "what" He is like.... and how this thinking developed over time or what it has evolved into since the time of Cyrus the Great.

To show the great influence Persia apparently had upon Jewish culture due to Zorasteriamism.

Then comparing these newer ways of thinking to the original views that Israeli or Jewish culture had before their exile into Babylon in 586 BCE when they were originally a polytheistic culture.

For the scripture was written and the stories within were developed while they were very polytheistic. For at that time the gods of Israel were very human like and we were made in their image and likeness.

In this old way of thinking, this pantheon of gods were limited in their knowledge and wisdom and these gods were viewed to be very physical like any man living today.

What happened over time however, after Cyrus...., the Judean elders started changing their stories from their original polytheistic past and narrative to a monotheistic view point.

However, because they were still developing at this time, the old viewpoints of El still come through. Likewise, one can see where they substituted the name of another deity with the name of El, where El originally didn't belong there.

For today "God" is viewed as a spiritual being with no physical body. "He" is also  omni-present and all-knowing or omniscient... and in other modern circles, having no human form whatsoever.

However, this is no where near the viewpoint of ancient Israel. In fact, Israel was no different, for example, than ancient Greece in their mythologies, where Zeus had a physical body, limited in this way and that way. He was the god of this and that and he had sons and those sons had children too.

El was viewed the same way
. El was married to Asherah and they had about 70 children together, if not more.

El was the chief deity and the father of the gods or of the pantheon. He was creator of all and of mankind.

Some of his kids were Baal, Yamm, Mot, Dagon and others like Lotan who was a great sea monster deity where the word, "Leviathan" comes from. This mythology remains intact pretty much in the Tanach. Which is pleasing to see, because you are finally tapping into the truth of how ancient Israel actually thought.

So, in reality Israel acknowledged and was apart of the polytheistic Canaanite religion and/or mythologies. 

So.... let's move on with the words of the actual Tanach and see this ancient way thinking of how they viewed El as a physical being with limitations like other mythologies do with their gods.

******************************************

In Genesis 1, and through out the Bible... it says, "And God said.....," where He actually speaks. Thus, He physically has an actual voice and what comes from that voice is the very original of all languages, being Hebrew.

[Of course that is a biased way of thinking from Jewish culture]

This is an example of what the texts says:

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."

The "us" in this text is actually a carry over from Israel's polytheistic days. For El was the Chief Deity, the Father of Gods and Creator of all. His wife Asherah, with their 70 sons and daughters and then their sons' sons and daughters. Baal, Yamm, Lotan, Dagon, Mot and Yehwah being some of them.

This forms the great council or heavenly court.

Do your history of the Canaanite Religion and also the Ugaritic texts.


So, then we read that El, the Father of this pantheon made man to look like Him as well as the other gods.

So El and this pantheon of deities have physical bodies.

El then "saw" all that he created and behold it was "very good."

If the ancient authors wanted to convey modern viewpoints of several circles and that of Maimonides, where "God" doesn't have any form whatsoever ...

They could have just as easily wrote, El created the light.... El created mankind from the dust of the earth..... without saying: El said; El saw; let us make mankind in our image; and so forth.

But, let's continue....

In Genesis 3, after we see the man (Adam) eating the fruit that his wife gave him.... 

We see this:
"....And they heard a noise from God walking in the garden.... ....[so they] hid themselves."

So we see El literally walking in this unique garden and while walking makes noise.... Adam and Eve get startled by El,  because they didn't expect him there and so they hid themselves. 

So, you see how this is like old Greek mythology where the gods have physical bodies and like those mythologies.... we then see El asking the odd question, "Where are you" indicating his limits of knowledge and thus displaying man's cute mythologies?

In the modern evolution of Judaic and Christian thinking, this seems very odd.... because with the modern thinking of theology one believes that "God" is all knowing.... yet here El doesn't know.

Remember, these are the mythologies from old pantheon days. Where a certain god is known for this and another deity is known for that.

So, again, here we see El with a very physical body making noise as he walks in the garden, whether that be from crushing leaves under foot, brushing against a limb with his garment, to whatever else the noise supposedly came from when El walked.

The cherubs El puts in place to guard the tree of life are also physical, else what is the point of threatening them with death from a physical sword that they are holding. 

In this myth, by the way, this is the lesson that modern thinkers don't grasp, because of whatever influences they might have. Christians have their influences separated from Jewish though. Nonetheless, here it is...

The gods of this pantheon are eternal to a point.... and this tree of life is the only way for man to escape their normal destined doom of natural death.

Christian "spiritual death" and their apologetics don't apply here.  

Remember, Adam and Eve are new to existence.... not like they had parents telling them while growing up that are constantly reminding them that some trees are for food while others are there to just look at. 

So, Adam and Eve were destined to die as it was, for that is how El made them. However, El gave them an opt out by providing the tree of life there.

However, they never took of that tree, ever. And, as long as they never ate from it.... they were just going to die at some point.

This is the whole meaning behind the words of El when he says.... "surely die" if they should dare eat of the tree of knowledge. 

Why? Because it is clear El didn't want them to eat from both trees, so if they ate from the knowledge tree first by disobeying... El would then prevent them from eating from the very powerful tree that would give them eternal life. Thus, they would "surely die" in their natural state and so blowing their chance for eternal life.

In this, by the way, we see why Paul is soooo wrong in his wild theology in that death came to all men due to Adam sinning. Nope, not at all, rather death was their natural state or order or normal outcome. Furthermore, their sin was atoned for from the animals El provided their garments from. The consequence of their transgression however was that they were permanently banned from the garden and so had to work way more harder to get food for themselves. 

From this whole narrative comes the polytheistic and mythological answers to:
1) why we die; 
2) why weeds form; 
3) why women have pain during labor;
4) why we, of all species, wear clothes
5) and why we work from the sweat of our brow just to eat, where the other species don't seem to
6) why snakes slither and have no limbs
7) why we have an innate fear of snakes or serpents

Seven answers to life's questions wrapped up in one convenient myth. 

Now lets move on: 
When we get to the tower of Babel story, we see the heavenly court having some sort of meeting again... so El wants to do something about it. 

This myth obviously came later, to give a mythological reason why an old ziggurat never got completed. If this myth originated in Babylon, or earlier in Sumer.... Israel adopted it while there after 586 BCE.... which in and of itself tells us that the Judeans were still very much polytheistic at the time.

Nonetheless, here it is and here we see the physical aspects of El....

[5] And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men were building.
[6] And the LORD said, Behold, the people are one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
[7] Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
[8] So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.

So you see how old this thinking is, soooo mythological in its delivery? Its exactly like the myths of the Greeks. Where El and the other gods are somewhere above and they had to physically come down to "see" what is going on. Then El asks the other gods to help in confounding them all. 

And so.... they had to come down just to confound them. 

In modern thinking, "God" is all knowing and all powerful and can do things without help and doesn't need to go somewhere just to do something.

Thus, if you leave these stories in their original polytheistic mindset, they are much easier to understand. But what you have today are the modified, edited and redacted versions of these old myths.... thanks to the elders of Judea that came back to Jerusalem sometime after Cyrus the Great which started promoting a monotheistic worldview.... which isn't their genuine heritage.

Moving on....

In Genesis 18, we see El appearing physically before Abraham as one of the three "men" and there Abraham talks with him after running to meet them all. Abraham also physically gives them food to eat, and water to wash their feet. So here we see a very physical deity!!!

Here is a snippet:

[1] And the LORD appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre: and he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day;
[2] And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground,
[3] And said, My Lord, if now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant:
[4] Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree:
[5] And I will fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort ye your hearts; after that ye shall pass on: for therefore are ye come to your servant. And they said, So do, as thou hast said.

[7] And Abraham ran unto the herd, and fetcht a calf tender and good, and gave it unto a young man; and he hasted to dress it.
[8] And he took butter, and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat.

[33] And the LORD went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place.

So we see that El is very physical and the two other "men," who are the two angels in the next chapter that visit Lot.

Moving on...
In Exodus... Moses sees his physical back...

Exodus  33
[18] And he (Moses) said, I beseech thee, shew me thy glory.
[19] And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy.
[20] And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.
[21] And the LORD said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock:
[22] And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by:
[23] And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.

So we see here, El is still a very a physical being. What I find interesting is that this particular author is way down the line of Israel's theological evolution. While the author still admits El is very physical... for some reason this particular author thinks El's face can't be seen, though elsewhere other authors don't share that view. 

Again, the modern Torah was written sometime after 380 BCE, after Ezra, and before 285 BCE when the Greek Septuagint was created in Alexandria Egypt.

Moving on.... 

1 Kings 22:
 [18] And the king of Israel said unto Jehoshaphat, Did I not tell thee that he would prophesy no good concerning me, but evil?
[19] And he said, Hear thou therefore the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left.
[20] And the LORD said, Who shall persuade Ahab, that he may go up and fall at Ramoth-gilead? And one said on this manner, and another said on that manner.
[21] And there came forth a spirit, and stood before the LORD, and said, I will persuade him.
[22] And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And he said, Thou shalt persuade him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so.
[23] Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil concerning thee.

This is a fine example of the "heavenly court" being seen as we see in Gen 1 and Gen 11 with the word, "us" being used in those passages. Though this story is heavily modified to reflect monotheism now and that only angels instead of the other deities makeup this heavenly court. 

I just wish they left the story alone... nonetheless El is physical and you can see him and that he has a chair to sit on. 

Ohhhh, this throne actually reminds me of the creation narrative again, something I skipped over. 

In those narratives, like with other gods in other mythologies, we see El tired and needs to be refreshed after creation.... for here is Exodus

Exodus 31
[17] It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever: for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed.

In story of Noah, El seems to have forgotten about Noah while he was on the ark, for this is what we read:

Genesis 7:24 - 8:1
And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
And God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark: and God made a wind to pass over the earth... 


Okay, so far we see El with a very physical body; he doesn't know everything; and he gets tired and needs to be refreshed. He eats and washes his feet and so forth. Lastly, like in other myths, El can seemingly get distracted and forget things.  


Moving on to Isaiah....

Isaiah 6
[1] In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple.
[2] Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly.
[3] And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.
[4] And the posts of the door moved at the voice of him that cried, and the house was filled with smoke.
[5] Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts.
[6] Then flew one of the seraphims unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar:
[7] And he laid it upon my mouth, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin purged.

This is very physical stuff and El definitely has a physical body as well as these seraphim and the objects that are seen and used. 

One passage I don't care to use because how long it is, but.....

Ezekiel 1,  I will let you read on your own.

Next comes from Daniel 

Daniel 7 
[9] I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
[10] A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.

What I find interesting is this about Daniel....

This book was written after Alexander the Great died and after the time his generals has all ready been reigning for some time.... and yet, El is still seen as a physical person. Another note on this.... this author obviously don't share the views of the author of the certain passage of Exodus where El's face can't be seen. Maybe it was a priest that wrote Exodus and he is just used to the holy of holies ritual where "God" can't be seen and, thus, he must go in with smoke from the incense. 

Keep in mind that this is what the "law" says....

Leviticus 16:13
[13] And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the LORD, that the cloud of the incense may cover the mercy seat that is upon the testimony, that he die not

We know that Yom Kippur doesn't exist till after Ezra, namely after Nehemiah 9. For in Nehemiah 8, we see them reading the whole law.... whatever version that was.... and there is no mention of Yom Kippur. Nope, only after the Tabernacle Feast do the people do something very simular to Yom Kippur on the 24th, not the 10th as what our current Torah says.

So, the authors of the unique passage found in Exodus and that of Lev 16, have simular views... if it is not the same person. Yet, Daniel who came later, doesn't hold the view that His face is not allowed to be seen.

Nonetheless, it is clear that the bible teaches that El is a physical being that you can actually see and feel.

So.... you can see that Judaism and Christianity has evolved over time to deal with whatever made them change their views over time. The views primarily changed due to people not willing to admit that their religious views don't align with facts, truth and real history. They don't align because they are mere inventions by superstitious story tellers. 

At the root of things there "might be" a genuine historical nugget, but it breaks off from there and becomes something all to itself.

What needs to be said is this....

After coming back from Babylon and Persia, the elders redacted the narratives so that they reflected condemnation for worshipping other gods where in fact that was their normal culture in the past. This is why there is so much worship of Baal and Asherah and other gods in the scriptures.


Maregaal
11:04 pm
1-4-2022







An e-mail to Bart Ehrmam

 


Did Matthew borrow from Pliny the Elder's work called, the natural history that came out in 77?


It would seem that...

Tiridates (a zorasterism priest (magus), and king of Armenia) and the princes with him are the magus (Magi) of Matthew....

when they came to bow down before Nero....

and interestingly enough, when this happened in the Year 0066, Halley's comet came at that time.

 Science fact actually on that.

---------

Not sure if you heard about this... but you can look up Tiridates in Pliny's work.

If so.... then the virgin birth idea wasn't invented til 0077.

Maregaal

The wise men, magus

Ugggg, anyone out there that digs for truth?

What I am currently trying to figure out something....

Even though the virgin birth never happened, putting aside the solid proofs to this fact....

...despite the two very different accounts of Matthew and Luke...


Was the source of Matthew's account actually rooted in historical fact about someone else and other historical facts,
though not tied to Jesus at all?

1) this is a historical fact I already gave in my paper here:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2309459449193449&id=100003882502448

Halley's comet was known by the ancients and Jewish people because we wrote about it in the oral law.

Not just by scientific math, but by observation as noted in historical texts.... mankind has observed Halley's comet and wrote about it in
466 BCE, 239 BCE, 164 BCE, 87 BCE, and 66 BCE. And others.

So it was known. By math, it came in 12 BCE and this is time frame Matthew is referring to....

HOWEVERRRRRR, the unknown author of Matthew  might be twisting another or several historical facts and tying them to Jesus.

We know by scientific math that Halleys comet came in 66. Well, something else happened that year which is historical fact.

According to the ancient writings of "Pliny the Elder," called....

"The Natural History," by Pliny is divided into 37 libri, or “books,” was completed, except for finishing touches, in 77 CE.

In these writings we find an Armenian ruler/king named Tiridates.

He was a priest in the Zorasterianism religion, thus being a "magus," this is where the word "magi" comes from.

In the year 66, the same year of Halley's comet mind you..... though Pliny doesn't mention the comet, Matthew does.

The Magus/priest and king comes from the East (namely the Armenian Empire) with others with him and he bows before a greater ruler. Which in this case is Nero. And he then goes back home.

Who were the others that were with him? Legit princes, not just of his own country but neighboring ones....

Here is a quote,
"Tiridates presented himself in Rome, bringing with him not only his own sons but also those of Vologases, of Pacorus, and of Monobazus."

Soooooo, it seems apparent that Matthew is throwing several things unto Jesus, total inventions, just so that he can be legitimate with star gazers, kings, and royalty according to "scripture" since Matthew likes to focus a lot on how Jesus supposedly "fulfilled" scripture; And, lastly.... dealing with Paul's and Paul's alone doctrine of the "sinful nature," thus Jesus was born from a virgin.

I dont think the virgin births of other gods played any role in Matthew's script, but only dealing with the issue of Paul's sinful nature doctrine.

So, the development of the magi story had to come after 77 AD when "The Natural History" came out. Thus.... it didn't exist before this!!!! 

 Thoughts?



Here is a link:

Another

One more


Maregaal
3:17 am
1/4/2022




Monday, January 3, 2022

Old Emails #2; contradicrions

This paper is from an e-mail I had that was dated :

10/29/2007


In this paper: It talks about the contradictions between Samuel and Chronicles in regards to the census that King David took. Likewise the differences of how the location of the Temple of El was chosen and other things. At the end, you can see my state of mind of how I reasoned with issues, because at that time I was high orthodox.


******************************************


In 2 Sam 24, it says that the anger of Yehowah burned against Israel and that He incited David against them to say, "Go, number Israel and Judah."

1 Chronicles 21 says "Then Satan stood up against Israel and moved David to number Israel."

 So was it Yehowah or satan? 

Keep in mind that a spiritual being called Satan didn't exist in the national psyche yet, but only after the exile of Babylon and then Persia

Joab's words differ slightly from the story recorded in 1 Chronicles 21 than in 2 Sam 24, it says that Joab says "why should he be a cause of guilt to Israel?" (2 Sam doesn't say this)

2 Sam 24 records that there were 800,000 valiant fighting men in Israel, and 500,000 valiant fighting men in Judah

1 Chronicles 21 says in Israel there were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword, in Judah, there were 470,000 men who drew the sword

 
1 chron 21 also records that Joab did not number Levi and Benjamin, but 2 Sam 24 does not say this

 

2 Sam 24 just says 'three days of pestilence' it does not say 'three days of the angel of the LORD destroying throughout all the territory of Israel" as in 1 chron 21.

 
2 Sam 24 records three different curses to pick from :

one is "shall seven years of famine come to you in your land..."

1 chron 21 says "take for yourself three years of famine"

2 Sam 24 says 'or flee three months before your foes while they pursue you'

1 chron 21 "three months to be swept away before your foes while the sword of your enemies overtakes you" (quite a difference from just being pursued!!)

 
2 Sam 24 'or shall there be three days pestilence in your land?"

1 chron 21 "or else three days of the sword of the LORD, even pestilence in the land, and the angel of the LORD destroying throughout all the territory of Israel"

 

the man with the threshing floor in 2 Sam 24 is "Arnuah the Jebusite", the man in 1 chron 21 is "Ornan the Jebusite" (the Hebrew is close, but not the same)

 

when David sees the angel it is different

2 Sam 24 Then David spoke to the LORD when he saw the angel who was striking down the people, and said, "Behold, it is I who have sinned, and it is I who have done wrong; but these sheep, what have they done? Please let Your hand be against me and against my father's house."

and

1 chron 21:"Then David lifted up his eyes and saw the angel of the LORD standing between earth and heaven, with his drawn sword in his hand stretched out over Jerusalem. Then David and the elders, covered with sackcloth, fell on their faces."

 
2 Sam 24 says that Gad came to David that day and told him to erect an altar to Yehowah on the threshing floor of Aranuah the Jebusite

and

1 Chron 21 says Then the angel of the LORD commanded Gad to say to David, that David should go up and build an altar to the LORD on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite.

 

2 Sam 24 just says that Aranuah sees King David and his servants coming and he runs out to meet them and bows down to the ground

and

1 chron 21 says:
Now Ornan turned back and saw the angel, and his four sons {who were} with him hid themselves. And Ornan was threshing wheat. As David came to Ornan, Ornan looked and saw David, and went out from the threshing floor and prostrated himself before David with his face to the ground.


2 Sam 24 records the price given to Aranuah by King David for the threshing floor:

So David bought the threshing floor and the oxen for fifty shekels of silver.

and

1 chron 21 records:
So David gave Ornan 600 shekels of gold by weight for the site.

 
VERY DIFFERENT PRICES!

 
2 Sam 24 records that David offered burnt offerings and peace offerings and that the LORD was moved by prayer for the land and the plague was held back from Israel

and

1 chron 21 has a very great miracle occur which is not recorded in 2 Sam 24

Then David built an altar to the LORD there and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. And he called to the LORD and He answered him with fire from heaven on the altar of burnt offering.


2 Sam 24 ends as above, but 1 chron 21 has more details:


The LORD commanded the angel, and he put his sword back in its sheath. At that time, when David saw that the LORD had answered him on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite, he offered sacrifice there. For the tabernacle of the LORD, which Moses had made in the wilderness, and the altar of burnt offering {were} in the high place at Gibeon at that time. But David could not go before it to inquire of God, for he was terrified by the sword of the angel of the LORD.

The crazy mindset we had at the time:

Basically, 1 chron 21 is much more detailed. I don't know which to believe in detail, but to only take it historically, and as the LORD told you, to only trust the actual words of the prophets as true scripture, everything else is probably not exact, as we can obviously see above! I would hope that samuel would be more true because it is the prophet's writings, or is it?

 

Maregaal, I just pray to our Father, the LORD God of Israel that He forgive our sins and may He send His holy angel to tell us the truth regarding all of these scriptures. Amen.


It would just be so wonderful to hear His voice in these things so that we would know what is the truth and what is not. We have to study much more!!

************************

So, you can see that we (my family at that time) saw these contradictions and we didn't really know what to do with them... so we often times kept things in the "vague zone." 

In that mentality... we agreed there was a census of some kind and that many people were numbered. Something then happened where people suddenly died soon afterwards and it was about this time that the location for the future Temple in Jerusalem was picked.

That was then in 2007 though. 

Now, however,  since 15 years has past, I can almost throw the whole Tanach away outright. 

Why? Because the elders of Judah that came back after the exile edited our true polytheistic history and so didn't erase certain stories.... but only modified them, thus the polytheism can still be seen and the old Canaanite mythologies. 

So it takes a lot of work for the reader to undo the editing that these elders did.

If you were to judge the true history and un-edited version of Israel with the mindset of today..... you would naturally condemn the Tanach wholesale for being outright "pagan." 

It is one thing to have a favorite deity like El from the rest of the pantheon of Canaan. It is another thing to eradicate the others by morphing them all together. 

Akhenaten was a monotheistic pharoah in Egypt among a polytheistic society, but he didn't morph the other deities with his, in most part anyways. 

What Judah did, however, is gave all the attributes of the other gods to El. 

In reality, however.....
El had a wife (Asherah) and they had many kids or demigods. Baal was just one of those kids and apparently Yehwah too, Dagon, Mot (death), Yamm (Sea), and many others. Even, Baal eventually had kids, one of which is Shalim, who of which "Jerushalem" is named after. Yamm had a sea dragon pet called Lotan, where we see him carried over with his mythologies in the Bible as the "Leviathan." Which shows us that the Tanach is just modified writings from Israel's pagan days or polytheistic days and to this day the old polytheistic views still show its residue. Regardless of the elders trying to change its genuine historical past.

So, eventually,  Yehowah and El morphed into the same person and, as I said, the positive characteristics of the other gods were all put onto or given to this new deity named El/Yehowah. By doing this.... the people only needed to look to one divine being.

What is interesting is this bigger question.... what prompted all this?

I have two theories:
1. The teachings of Zorasterianism might had something to do with it.
2. Maybe mixed with #1, but seeing that Judah still existed as a people and as a national identity, coupled with the facts that the Temple dedicated to El was a real place they did worship at and Cyrus allowed it to be built again and no other apparently. So, El came into the forefront. And, besides He was known already in polytheistic days to be the Father of creation, mankind and all other gods.

Maregaal
1-3-2022


















LEVIATHAN or Lotan being destroyed





OLD EMAILS #1 Contradictions

This paper is from an e-mail I had that was dated :

11/24/2019

However, the original text or e-mail was probably before 2014. Because it seems I am still practicing Biblical Judaic orthodoxy. 

This paper displays some unique contradictions of the Tanach.

Likewise, Rabbi Skobac counters me with modern Judaic apologetics, views not of the Tanach, but that are simular to Maimonides who lived in Islamic lands. For Maimonides didn't believe that HaShem had any sort of image. Which totally ignores the various passages of the Jewish bible. However, many "orthodox" and "chasidic" groups follow the teachings of Maimonides.


*****************************************


I found another contradiction in the Tanach that I did not see before, yes there are many...

After reading the Torah portion, we were reading about Solomon and comparing the books of Kings with the books of Chronicles. I do find it interesting that Chronicles paints Solomon in a more Torah observant light. Whereas, 1 Kings just unleashes its condemnation of Solomon in many ways. I also found it interesting that Chronicles doesn't mention his many wives, nor the idolatrous houses he built for them...

In fact, many of the contradictions of the Tanach deal with the two books of Chronicles.

Well anyways, the contradiction I found this time was the commandment found in the Torah that says..., "When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and shall cast out many nations before thee, the Hittite, and the Girgashite, and the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; and when the LORD thy God shall deliver them up before thee, and thou shalt smite them; then thou shalt utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them; neither shalt thou make marriages with them..."

Yet, this is what we see Solomon doing in 2 Chron 8...
"As for all the people that were left of the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, who were not of Israel; of their children that were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel consumed not, of them did Solomon raise a levy of bondservants, unto this day."

Through my own study, I know that the current Torah was written after the Babylonian captivity. Many scholars agree to this same conclusion by the fact of "what" is in the Torah. Deut 17 is a good example of "Anti-Solomon" passages; whereas, according to other "scriptures" of the Tanach, Solomon did not sin at all for having his many wives (but only for having idolatrous ones), nor for having his gold, nor for having many horses and...

Well, because Solomon did not destroy, but instead employed these non-Jews, it seems like there was no commandment to kill these people to begin with, for the mere sake of wiping them off the face of the earth.
In war, one could easily carry out the commandment to destroy these people, if there was a commandment from HaShem to do such a thing, but Solomon did not do this.


In ancient wars the people oftentimes killed all the males and took the women and young children, so we seem to see this and not a genocide of the Canaanites.

Give me your thoughts...
For this is what "AncientJudaism.org" is all about, we try to find the truth of our people before the Babylonian captivity and the Rabbinical age.

Maregaal

-------------

Rabbi Skobac says,

"Don't forget that Deuteronomy looks back and describes things that occurred in Exodus. And once again, any passage that speaks about people "seeing" the Almighty have to be understood in light of all the passages that say G-d is not physical, has no form, can't be seen, etc. And again, what you or I "read" is not the standard that G-d instituted. He told us that the standard of what we are to believe or not believe about Him is based upon the revelation to all the Jewish people who stood at Mt.Sinai. No Jew reported to their children that we are to understand G-d or relate to Him as physical. This should be fairly easy to understand."

Rabbi, Deut 4 does not say HaShem DOESN'T have a human form, it merely says that NO ONE SAW Him. Why? Because He was in the thick darkness. I am talking about the majority of the people.

Again, when Samuel says...
"And also the Glory of Israel will not lie nor repent; for He is not a man, that He should repent," What is the context? The context is that He is a Spirit and One Who knows everything, thus He makes no mistakes my friend.

Balaam says a similar phrase...
"God is not a man, that He should lie; neither the son of man, that He should repent: when He hath said, will He not do it? or when He hath spoken, will He not make it good?"

Balaam doesn’t say, “He has no form,” he merely says that He is not a human.

Even though He is not a human "man," scripture is very clear that He has a human form and that we were made in His image and many prophets have not only seen Him, but also described what He looks like.

There is not a single verse in all of the Tanach, not one, that says "God has no form." On the contrary, the Tanach does display many times that He has a human form, but we are not allowed to draw Him.



Maregaal

*****************************************

ancientjudaism.org is my old website that I let lapse due to my findings of all the falsehoods and contradictions of the Tanach.

I will have to create a paper displaying all the passages of the Tanach that show El's "physical" appearance. 

Maregaal






Sunday, January 2, 2022

Age of the Earth: From the Bible

WHAT IS THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE

ACCORDING TO THE TANACH

6,184


Though I personally don't believe in this young age for the earth and universe, this is what the Jewish Bible or Tanach promotes nonetheless. In the Christian world the Tanach is the so-called, "Old Testament."

Starting with Genesis and going on through the Tanach we find a non-broken chain of descendants starting with Adam to Jacob entering the land of Egypt. Then we have a date of how long we were there supposedly; then we can skip to Solomon's 4th year of his reign, because scripture tells a date from the exodus to then; after that we can count how long the Judean kings reigned over Judah to the time Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the Temple in Jerusalem in 586 BCE.

From all of these times, the age of the earth is slightly over 6,180 years old according to the pages of the Tanach, not according to scienctific fact.

************************

So, let's get started.... 

1) Adam was formed from the dust of the earth on the 6th day of the first lunar month, in the Spring.  Eve was also formed on the very same day, but from Adam's rib and after Adam named all the animals

When Adam was 130 years old he begot Seth

2) when Seth was 105
3) Enosh was 90
4) Kenan was 70
5) Mahalael was 65
6) Jared was 162
7) Enoch was 65
8) Methuselah was 187
9) Lamech was 182
10) Noah was 502 (Gen 11:10)

11) Shem was 100
12) Arpachshad was 35
13) Shelah was 30
14) Eber was 34 (where the word,
       "Hebrew" comes from)
15) Peleg was 30
16) Reu was 32
17) Serug was 30
18) Nahor was 29
19) Terah was around 70
20) Abraham was 100 (Gen 21:5)
21) Isaac was 60 (Gen 25:26)
22) Jacob was 130 when he entered
       the land of Egypt (Gen 47:9)
23) Israel was in Egypt for 430 years
       (Exodus 12:40-41)

24) from the Exodus to the 4th year
       of Solomon, 480 years past
       (1 Kings 6:1)
25) Solomon reigned 36 more years,
       out of 40 (1 Kings 11:41-42)

26) Rehoboam reigned 17 years
      (1 Kings 14:21)
27) Abijam reigned 3 years
      (1 Kings 15:2)
28) Asa reigned 41 years
      (1 Kings 15:9-10)
29) Jehoshaphat reigned 25 years
       (1 Kings 22:41-42)
30) Jehoram reigned 8 years
       (2 Kings 8:16-17)
31) Ahaziah reigned 1 year
       (2 Kings 8:25-26)
32) Athaliah the Queen reigned 6 years
       (2 Kings 11:1-4)
33) Jehoash reigned 40 years
       (2 Kings 12:1-3)
34) Amaziah reigned 29 years
       (2 Kings 14:1-2)
35) Uzziah (Azariah) reigned 52 years
       (2 Kings 15:1-3)
36) Jotham reigned 16 years
       (2 Kings 15:32-34)
37) Ahaz reigned 16 years
       (2 Kings 16:1-2)
38) Hezekiah reigned 29 years
       (2 Kings 18:1-3)
39) Manasseh reigned 55 years
       (2 Kings 21:1-2)
40) Amon reigned 2 years
       (2 Kings 21:18-20)
41) Josiah reigned 31 years
       (2 Kings 21:25 - 22:2)
42) Jehoahaz reigned 3 months
       (2 Kings 23:28-31)
43) Eliakim (Jehoiakim) reigned 11 y.
       (2 Kings 23:34-37)
44) Jehoiachin reigned 3 months
       (2 Kings 24:8-9)

45) Zedekiah reigned 11 years...
       this is when Nebuchadnezzar
       came and burned down the Temple
       in Jerusalem in 586 BCE

_____________________________

So, doing the math correctly....

From Adam to the Temple being destroyed is.............3,578 years

When Nebuchadnezzar burned the
Temple...................... 586 BCE

The year from last Spring 2021

    3578
+    586
+  2021
_______
  6,185

Now 6185 - 1 for the year 0000, since there is no year zero =

6,184 Years old, as of Spring 2021

So, according to the Tanach, not reality, the earth is just 6,184 years old!!!
_____________________________________________

So, according to "The Bible" here are some important dates:

1. Creation happened in 4,163 BCE
2. THE FLOOD happened in 2,507 BCE 
3. The birth of Abraham in 2,215 BCE
4. The Exodus in 1,495 BCE
5. Solomon began to reign in 1,019 BCE



Maregaal
Jan 2, 2022
Time 4:38 pm









     

When Did Creation take Place?


 




So...

What is the biblical doctrine of when the creation of all existence and the universe happen or take place?

Keep in mind that this is NOT according to scientific fact, but to ancient religious dogma, belief and superstition.

Likewise, keep in mind that the Tanach is written with a Jewish mindset, worldview and religious bigotry.

According to the Torah.... creation happened on the 1st day (24 hours) of the first Jewish lunar month.

That first day (24 hours) translates into Sunday pretty much. To be technical and exact... it would be from Saturday evening at Sunset to Sunday evening at Sunset. This is just a reference point for understanding.... even though the sun and moon and stars were made on the "4th day."

The Jewish lunar calendar begins in the Spring. It goes like this.

The first New Moon that either falls exactly on the Spring equinox or one that falls anytime after that "IS" the biblical New Year! It is not in the Fall as you see in "Rabbinical Judaism."

Therefore, creation started on  Saturday evening and so the astronomical New Moon came before sunset of that Saturday, so that the first "day" would be on Sunday.

You might have grasped a fraction of these doctrines through common sense when you heard that Adam was made on the 6th day. And you correctly interpreted that to be Friday.
However, you may have not understood when in the year this supposesly happened.

So, there you go.

P.S., each day is to be viewed as a normal 24 hours, not some "one day is like a thousand years" type of thing.



Maregaal
1-2-2022